Forum

Solving the unwante...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

Solving the unwanted pressing of CPX remote keys 🙂


Javi
Posts: 82
 Javi
Topic starter
(@javi)
Trusted Member
Joined: 1 year ago

LazyBear shown in another post a way of avoiding unwanted pressing keys in the remote. Those who own a CPx know what we mean. Improving his idea/desing I measured the remote and I desinged a SVG file for cutting foam with a laser CNC cutter/engraver. I bought 2 mm thick EVA foam with adhesive in its back.

Here you have images of the foam, the part cutted with the laser and final aspect of the design. Hope this help other users 😉 The desing is freely usable for anyone.

IMG 20210405 171251

 

IMG 20210405 171013

 

IMG 20210405 171228

 

IMG 20210405 171238

I can not upload the svg file 😥. If anyone needs the svg file send me a message and I will send it to you for you use.

 

...Javi

 

 

5 Replies
LazyBear
Posts: 26
(@lazybear)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago

Very nice design ! 🙂 Is it efficient ?

Reply
3 Replies
Javi
 Javi
(@javi)
Joined: 1 year ago

Trusted Member
Posts: 82

@lazybear

I just finish the desing and the cutting process yesterday. I will start using it this week. If is not efficient enought or if the foam is too soft I show in Amazon pieces of syntetic leather with adhesive that will be stiffer that the eva foam. I will keep you informed 😉

Reply
Viktormors
(@viktormors)
Joined: 4 months ago

New Member
Posts: 1

@javi  Please send me the SVG file. thanks

Here are some CPX user who can use the part.

 

v-tourniaire@t-online.de

Reply
potatorato
(@potatorato)
Joined: 5 months ago

New Member
Posts: 3

@javi Hi. Can you send me the file?. I'll try. Thanks

marcanas3@gmail.com

Reply
Javi
Posts: 82
 Javi
Topic starter
(@javi)
Trusted Member
Joined: 1 year ago

After a week of using the remote with the foam sticker I can inform you that is really efficient. 2mm of foam is enough. In fact I put my remote with many other keys in the pocket and I never pressed any remote button accidentally again 🙂

Reply
Share: